Free-for-all discussion!
By Miller
#16564
Some dumb ass wrote:*Suddenly a blackman, also naked, comes behind of CJayC"
Some other dumb ass wrote:*runs screaming from black man, with junk flopping in the wind*
*RAEP*
Then some dumb ass wrote:*CJay still running away and screaming like a little girl. He finds a rock and throw it at the blackman.*
And some other dumb ass wrote:*screams bad racial things at the nig-I mean blackman*
*leaves a splooge trail all the way home*
Is this the sort of thing you would want Tobias Jones to come in here and read at a website that is a tribute to him? Is there anyone who believes that posting this sort of garbage that reinforces pejorative racial stereotypes is going to help DriverMadness.net attract new members? You ought to go back and delete that crap so that people who may still peruse this topic do not see it. Of course, this time that actually is just my opinion and nothing else.
User avatar
By Coyote
#16565
Yea I agree with you mate.

It's on page 21 guys
User avatar
By T.K.
#16568
two of those were the mod's.

Good going.

BAN HIM.
User avatar
By bb_42001
#16570
hahahahaha.... don't worry, we aren't going to ban anyone.. it was all in good fun, it just displays a bad public image

bb42001

10

Noodles
 
User avatar
By T.K.
#16571
It's the General board.
It ususally does.










UR FACE
User avatar
By Nikusakken
#16579
Blackman is a derogatory word? I've search on internet and I didn't find anything related to a black person. Only to the surname "Blackman".
User avatar
By T.K.
#16584
*rolls up sleeves*
Let's get im.
User avatar
By T.K.
#16590
Not you.
Miller
COME ON OVER HERE BEER BOY
By Miller
#16644
CJayC wrote:Not you.
Miller
COME ON OVER HERE BEER BOY
Man, I do not really think you need any further assistance from me to make yourself look foolish, if that is what you truly wish to do. That, by the way, is something we all have to deal with from time to time, including myself (e.g., click fraud proposal). I am sorry your feelings got hurt. Why don
User avatar
By Nikusakken
#16659
Wow Miller. I'll be thinking in everything that you wrote there when I sleep (Not a bad thing of course).
User avatar
By Coyote
#16665
Yea, you will actually dream about him.
User avatar
By Nikusakken
#16667
Nah. I've already sleep and I haven't dreamed about him.
User avatar
By T.K.
#16741
Happy thanksgiving, happy holidays, and merry christmas to all who celebrate this! I LOVE TODAY!

*turns on Elvis Presley's "Here comes Santa Claus"*
User avatar
By T.K.
#16747
Where I live, we basically get ready for Christmas in November. My town gets the christmas lights up and lit, we might set the tree up in my hous today, I listen to christmas music.

And the parents are out shopping.
It's all good.
User avatar
By Nikusakken
#16748
Here at home, we've already set the tree up in the begin of this month.
User avatar
By madness
#16756
Well I think Christmas, Birthdays and things like that are big scams thought-up ages ago by retailers and manufactures in order to scam peoples money.

Do we really need so much junk out in the market. I go around looking at all these toys and they all look as if their gonna break in the first week of usage and/or they are designed to entertain for a little but then their considered useless junk. Same goes for a lot of this novelty stuff that looks alright to give someone but it's useless.

Think about the environmental impact of the hundreds of billions of cards that get sent around, then all those unwanted gift-presents or presents which are simply a waste of money (something you don't need).

And those weird Christmas lights/trees everyone buys that cause more environmental impact.

Sure, I do see the recreational side.
But I think we take too much for granted on this planet and we need to step back a bit and there are many other recreational activities out there that don't involve wasting our planets resources.

Ok, now I sound like a tree-huger. Though, I'm not.
I just believe things need to be significantly evened out.
If out lifestyle continues like this we'll all probably be dead.


On a similar topic the planet is over populated.
Therefore more people need things and there aren't enough resources.
Same as it's increasing the polluting traffic on our roads.
I cannot believe that governments reward parents to have children.
If we only had 1/20th of the humans we have today there would mostly-likely be no signs of Global Warming.



This probably sounds weird, but I've made this post out of anger after having a bad day :o .
User avatar
By T.K.
#16762
This'll sound mean, but we'd be more overpopulated if it weren't for Hitler.


On another note, people say I look like said Hitler >_>
User avatar
By Nikusakken
#16765
The only way to decrease the population of the world is if some kind of disaster affect the whole planet. Like the pandemic of a virus or something.
CJayC wrote:This'll sound mean, but we'd be more overpopulated if it weren't for Hitler.
Lemme guess, because he killed a lot of Jews and other people, and if those people were alive, the planet would have about 1.5% more people?
CJayC wrote:On another note, people say I look like said Hitler >_>
Does people laugh at you too much?

BTW, people say that I look lika an asian, even though I'm black.
User avatar
By T.K.
#16766
Nick Brasil wrote:The only way to decrease the population of the world is if some kind of disaster affect the whole planet. Like the pandemic of a virus or something.
CJayC wrote:This'll sound mean, but we'd be more overpopulated if it weren't for Hitler.
Lemme guess, because he killed a lot of Jews and other people, and if those people were alive, the planet would have about 1.5% more people?
CJayC wrote:On another note, people say I look like said Hitler >_>
Does people laugh at you too much?

BTW, people say that I look lika an asian, even though I'm black.
Well, they would have kids, and those kids would have kids, and those kids would have kids. That adds up.

And no, I do not get made fun of because most people judge by his mustache, which I do not have, but some people have judged me by my facial structure.
User avatar
By madness
#16769
We don't want people to un-naturally die that'd be stupid.
We just want all the parents out their to be satisfied with one child.
not 24, not 5, not 9, not 7, not 2, just 1.

It's true there are some people around with at least 16 children.
I'm sure I read somewhere about someone having 24, I'm sure someone out in the world has had more.

If the world was less populated most-likely we wouldn't have people dieing due to poverty (more resources to share around).


I'm just annoyed the government here was paying parents $3000 or a similar figure if they had a child. It doesn't do anything to the country other than over-populate it and wastes tax-payers valuable money that could be spent elsewhere.
User avatar
By Nikusakken
#16770
madness wrote:We just want all the parents out their to be satisfied with one child.
not 24, not 5, not 9, not 7, not 2, just 1.
Say this to the brazilian poor people in northeast area here, where they don't do anything besides having children. And trust me, getting condoms here, whatever if it in a rich or poor area, is as easy as eating.
madness wrote:I'm just annoyed the government here was paying parents $3000 or a similar figure if they had a child. It doesn't do anything to the country other than over-populate it and wastes tax-payers valuable money that could be spent elsewhere.
Always when I read something about population, I remind of China and India. That's what I call overpopulation.
User avatar
By madness
#16771
Nick Brasil wrote:
madness wrote:We just want all the parents out their to be satisfied with one child.
not 24, not 5, not 9, not 7, not 2, just 1.
Say this to the brazilian poor people in northeast area here, where they don't do anything besides having children. And trust me, getting condoms here, whatever if it in a rich or poor area, is as easy as eating.
In Australia they were going to have at least one condom vending machine in each High School. I'm not sure what happened, but unfortunately it hasn't happened yet.

Have to find them in the supermarket, if you need em.


A quick google (web) search finds these results.
http://www.feministing.com/archives/002760.html
feministing.com wrote: Australian Democrats want condom vending machines placed in schools. Ah, if only this could happen here.
Democrat MP Kate Reynolds said the issue was not one of morals, but health.

"The facts are simple: high school teenagers are having sex," Ms Reynolds said.

Ms Reynolds said vending machines should be placed where students could buy condoms easily and without guilt.
We used to be able to get condoms from guidance counselors in school, but it was no easy task. Outside of the embarrassment factor, they actually had a list of kids who could not receive condoms--their parents had called in and specifically requested that they be barred from getting them. Twisted.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/stories/s61943.htm
MARK COLVIN: Forget the chemist, the corner store and the public convenience; teenagers in Victoria could soon be getting their contraceptives at their local school.

The new Bracks Labor Government has agreed to allow condom vending machines to be installed in the State's high schools. Shane McLeod reports.

SHANE McLEOD: Australia has come a long way from the days when the only place to get hold of a condom was at your local chemist. These days the contraceptive devices have made their way into a number of public locations, including vending machines at airports, shopping centres, universities and public toilets. And they're being sold over the counter at supermarkets and your local corner store.

But the new Victorian Government is going a step further; it's taking condoms to school.

MARY DELAHUNTY: If school communities believe that this would be of an advantage to their school community, provided that they have done extensive consultation, that they have the universal support of parents and students, the existing policy says that they can apply to the Department of Education.

SHANE McLEOD: Victoria's new Education Minister, Mary Delahunty. She's prepared to allow high schools to install condom vending machines in student toilets, but only with the support of parents and teachers. But family groups say it sends the wrong message to teenagers about the acceptability of sexual activity.

Mary Helen Woods is the National Vice President of the Australian Family Association.

MARY HELEN WOODS: The one message of condom vending machines is: you know you can be as sexually promiscuous as you like, and here's the apparatus.

Now, children really are worth much more than this. And this - if these are offered in secondary schools, that's anybody from age 11 or 12, to 17 or 18. It's just a highly inappropriate thing to put in front of children.

It's interesting that we would be much more careful about offering other things to school-children; for instance, we wouldn't dream of putting cigarette vending machines into schools, and that's because we recognise the dangers of cigarette smoking.

There are great and inherent dangers with sexual promiscuity in young people. Sexual activity isn't really appropriate in adolescence and it can do far more harm than good, and therefore our main responsibility as adults is to determine what is the best education for our children, to make them whole and rounded people. And this isn't going to do this, it's just a short, simple message: okay, whatever you want to do is okay.

SHANE McLEOD: What about the argument that kids are going to get hold of these anyway?

MARY HELEN WOODS: Well, I suppose you could say, why put them in schools because they are readily accessible anyhow? And I think this is true. I think anybody who wants to get hold of condoms can do so. And that's another reason why you wouldn't put them in schools. You're going to offend significant members of the community. There would be many different ethnic groups that would be very offended by that. There would be many Australians who belong to various religions who would be offended by it.

And so if condoms are deemed to be something absolutely essential for an adolescent, then they should be got elsewhere. But certainly not in schools.

SHANE McLEOD: But there is support for the machines from the people running the schools, and the parents of the students. And the Family Planning Association of Australia President, Professor Gabor Kovaks [phonetic], says it's hard to argue against the introduction of the machines.

GABOR KOVAKS: I remember go - I've got this deja vu feeling - we went through supermarkets about 15 years ago - whether condoms should be in supermarkets, and there was sort of a bit of an uproar about it, and then everyone accepted it, and now you don't look twice at them. And I believe the principle should be that contraception should be as freely available as possible.

Contraception does not lead to sexual activity. And the lack of contraception does not prevent sexual activity. So if we accept the fact that young people are going to be sexually active, let's do our very best to have them practicing safe sex, not having unplanned pregnancies, and not catching sexually transmitted diseases.

MARK COLVIN: Professor Gabor Kovaks, from the Family Planning Association of Australia, with Shane McLeod
This was in discussion a couple of years ago, yet nothing happened.
:o Disappointing, :cry: .
User avatar
By Nikusakken
#16772
Here in Brazil, there was also a project for condom machines in school. Different from Australia, there's about 1.500 schools with this machine over here.
User avatar
By Coyote
#16773
We have some in our school.
  • 1
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 224
Felony Rework

Don't know if you're still active, but I seem to h[…]

https://youtu.be/hN0qiEBPCY8 Maserati Huge Stunt […]

Free Chat

Happy new year, 2025 :turnah: :specialdriver:

Driv3r: Definitive Edition Mod

The new update for Driv3r Definitive Edition is ou[…]